Spiritual cannabis
Notice of Confidentiality WITHOUT PREJUDICE, EXTREME OR OTHER WISE
Spiritual use of cannabis
420 (cannabis culture) – Wikipedia The religious and spiritual use of cannabis has an ancient history of ritual usage as an aid to trance and has been traditionally used in a religious context throughout the Old World. Herodotus wrote about early ceremonial practices by the Scythians, which are thought to have occurred from the 5th to 2nd century BCE. Itinerant sadhus have used it in India for centuries, and in modern times it has been embraced by the Rastafari movement. Anthropologist Sula Benet‘s evidence was confirmed in 1980 by the Hebrew Institute of Jerusalem[1] that the Holy anointing oil used by the Hebrews to anoint all Priests, and later Kings and Prophets, contained cannabis extracts, "kaneh bosm" (קְנֵה-בֹשֶׂם), and that it is listed as an incense tree in the original Hebrew and Aramaic texts of the Old Testament. [2][3] The Unction, Seal, laying on of hands, the Counselor, and the Holy Spirit are all often synonymous with the Holy anointing oil. Early Gnostic texts indicate that the Chrism is essential to becoming a "Christian."[5][6] Some Muslims of the Sufi order have used cannabis as a tool for spiritual exploration
Cancer patient blames Health Canada delays for pot charges we have the Supreme court working on that right now
the government does not have an unfettered ( check wording ) right to limit the usage of pot, in medical capacity, to those that require it, in the instance of it’s entertainment into the booze business – as it does not require a biblical requirement to paper, to purchase, under authority of medical requirements alone – or to cause the forced applications to serve medicines at it’s discretion through a doctor to monetary gain, as it’s sole advantage in restricting accessibility to medical pot, that it has entertained to a controlled type subject – for the purpose of appeasing to big business in a discriminatory fashion – as but law state in supreme court rulings – a person has the right to refuse a medication under duress, it can not restrict a medication under the same principles – nor implement it with out consent of the recipient – lenience to the requested is above that of the restricted in the case of an accused ? thus the benefit is to him – forcible confinement is forcible confinement – however it has a right within limitations, to reside it’s distribution through proper abilities to benefit the innocent –

Pingback: w2.4.11a – c-17 – no such thing as eggs in Judaism – “ I’m a detective now “ bee stings on my John « Arthur2rcasc's Blog
Pingback: w2.5.1a – wedding odds the bookies won’t take – 100 % to 0ne, the son of man will not be there « Arthur2rcasc's Blog