Legal Disclaimer
Notice of Confidentiality WITHOUT PREJUDICE, EXTREME OR OTHER WISE Legal disclaimer
w1.1.1a-a+ legal beagle
Notice of Confidentiality : The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, re-transmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender immediately by return electronic transmission and then immediately delete this transmission, including attachments, without copying, distributing or disclosing same. Thank you! DISCLAIMER No responsibility or liability shall attach itself to the RCASC TEAM for any or all of the articles placed here. The placing of an article hereupon does not necessarily imply that the RCASC Team agree or accept the contents of the article as being necessarily factual in theology, dogma or otherwise. WITHOUT PREJUDICE, EXTREME OR OTHER WISE Legal disclaimer The information and resources presented on this site are for informative purposes only. Although we Endeavour to provide accurate information, there can be no guarantee of the accuracy, completeness, usefulness or adequacy of any resources, information, apparatus, product, or process available at or from this website, or from external sites that we have linked to. Trademarked names appear throughout this website. Rather than list the names and entities that own the trademarks or insert a trademark symbol with each mention of the trademarked name, the publisher states that it and associated journalists are using the names only for editorial purposes and to the benefit of the trademark owner with no intention of infringing upon that trademark. All information provided is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we Endeavour to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act upon such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the facts of the particular situation.
Even Hurtful Speech
U.S. Supreme Court Rules ‘Hurtful Speech’ of Westboro Baptist Church is Protected Under First Amendment
Hurtful & Hateful Speech Protected In a recent decision delivered by Chief Justice Roberts, the United States Supreme Court addressed the question whether the First Amendment shields church members from tort liability for their hateful speech. The followers of the Westboro Baptist Church in Topeka, Kansas (Defendants), believe that God hates and punishes the United States for its tolerance of homosexuality, particularly in America’s military. Defendants picketed the funeral of Marine Lance Corporal Snyder, who was killed in Iraq in the line of duty. Defendants picketed on public land displaying signs stating, e.g., “ Thank God for Dead Soldiers,” “ Fags Doom Nations,” “ America is Doomed ,” “ Priests Rape Boys ,” and “ You’re Going to Hell ”, approximately 1,000 feet from the church where the funeral was held. Plaintiff, father of the deceased soldier, filed action under various tort theories. Justice Roberts stated, “Speech is powerful. It can stir people to action, move them to tears of both joy and sorrow, and-as it did here-inflict great pain. On the facts before us, we cannot react to that pain by punishing the speaker. As a Nation we have chosen a different course-to protect even hurtful speech on public issues to ensure that we do not stifle public debate. That choice requires that we shield Westboro from tort liability for its picketing in this case.” Snyder v. Phelps, 09-751, 2011 WL 709517 (U.S. Mar. 2, 2011). The Supreme Court oral argument transcript is here: 2010 WL 3907899.
![earthline_thumb[4]](http://arthur2rcasc.files.wordpress.com/2011/05/earthline_thumb4_thumb3.gif?w=214&h=4&h=4){kind=small}
Britain’s Long, Sad Journey of Jew Hatred
yes you can arrest the Pope, or the Queen for such acts, any thing less damages the reputation of the church
